What Is Disciplined Agile? Guide (2025)

Agile, emerging in 2001, emphasizes collaboration, working software, and feedback. It involves iterative work, continuous plan refinement, and small, incremental releases. Scrum and Kanban are popular, with improved collaboration and alignment cited as top benefits. Agile is a mindset promoting short cycles, customer feedback, and adaptability. Frameworks like Scrum, Kanban, and Lean offer structure, but teams often adopt them superficially, leading to problems.

Organizations struggle with "one-size-fits-all" frameworks, facing rigidity with regulatory requirements, complex architecture, or legacy system integration. Scaling agile introduces coordination, governance, and compliance issues. 

While agile has expanded beyond software, this raises consistency and oversight questions. Cultural resistance, lack of skilled practitioners, and scaling difficulties remain hurdles. Organizations need more flexibility and contextual guidance, which Disciplined Agile aims to provide. This article explains Disciplined Agile (DA), comparing it to other methods and outlining adoption steps.

What is Disciplined Agile?

Disciplined Agile is often introduced as a process decision toolkit rather than a fixed framework. Scott Ambler and Mark Lines described it first in their book Choose Your WoW. Parabol’s guide calls it an “extensive collection of strategies and practices taken from agile frameworks and other methodologies like lean and waterfall”. Instead of prescribing ceremonies and roles, Disciplined Agile helps teams select practices that fit their context.

Why the word “disciplined”?

DA emphasises intentionality and trade‑offs. Rather than adopting practices blindly, teams examine options and understand their consequences. PMI notes that DA’s core philosophy is empowerment through informed choice, helping users improve their way of working (WoW) in a context‑sensitive manner. The “disciplined” aspect reminds teams to follow governance, consider organisational constraints and continually improve rather than drifting into chaos. It also encourages consistency and repeatability while still allowing variation where it makes sense.

The DA mindset and principles

Disciplined Agile is grounded in eight principles:

• Delight customers: do more than merely meeting needs and strive to surprise and please users.
  
  
• Be awesome: constantly work to improve yourself and your team.
  
  
• Context counts: every team and situation is unique, so choose practices that reflect your environment.
  
  
• Be pragmatic: aim for effectiveness rather than blindly chasing agility; combine agile, lean or even traditional strategies when they make sense.
  
  
• Choice is good: having options and understanding their trade‑offs is crucial.
  
  
• Optimize flow: focus on smooth value delivery across the value stream.
  
  
• Organize around products/services: structure teams around value streams rather than functions.
  
  
• Enterprise awareness: consider organisational needs outside the team and coordinate with long‑term goals.

These principles are both philosophical and practical. For example, “context counts” means a financial‑services startup with strict regulatory requirements might need heavier governance than a consumer app. “Optimize flow” encourages teams to look outside their sprint or backlog and examine how work moves from concept to customer. “Enterprise awareness” reminds teams to reuse existing assets and follow organisational policies instead of reinventing the wheel.

Scope outside software

DA is not limited to development. It extends into IT operations, procurement, finance, architecture and other domains. PMI describes how the toolkit helps organisations analyse and optimise value streams across functional silos. The idea of a Disciplined Agile Enterprise (DAE) encompasses an organisation that can sense and respond to market changes through responsive structures and practices. This bigger view is crucial for startups that are growing quickly and need to coordinate product, design, engineering and operations rather than focusing solely on coding.

Core components and structure of DA

To fully grasp what is disciplined agile, you also need to understand its core components and layered structure.

Disciplined Agile is organised into layers. Process blades (also called domains) address areas such as delivery, DevOps, architecture, governance, security and procurement. Within each blade, the toolkit offers process goals with decision points and options. PMI’s introduction explains that each goal covers multiple decision points and that DA catalogues potential options, highlighting the trade‑offs associated with each. This encourages teams to think about why they pick a particular practice and what they gain or lose.

Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD)

DAD is the foundation of the toolkit. It provides a people‑first, hybrid, full‑lifecycle approach to solution delivery. Unlike traditional Scrum that focuses on the construction phase, DAD recognises three phases: inception, construction and transition. Inception involves envisioning the product, forming the team, and establishing the architecture and governance approach. Construction covers iterative development and integration. Transition ensures the solution is consumable by users and addresses operational considerations. DAD guides teams through decision points such as whether to adopt Scrum, Kanban or a continuous delivery lifecycle and how to handle architecture, design and testing along the way.

Other domains and blades

In addition to delivery, DA includes Disciplined DevOps, which integrates development and operations practices; enterprise architecture and IT operations, ensuring architectural runway and infrastructure readiness; governance and security, providing guardrails without excessive bureaucracy; procurement and vendor management, addressing contracts and external dependencies; and value streams and lean budgeting, coordinating funding with outcomes. Each domain offers process goals with decision points that help teams pick relevant techniques—for example, whether to use microservices, monoliths, or serverless in architecture or how to manage releases and support.

Decision framework and process‑goal diagrams

A distinctive feature of DA is its decision framework. PMI’s introduction describes how goal diagrams begin with an overarching goal (such as “Address risk”) and break it into decision points (“How will we identify risks?”) with multiple options. Options might be ordered by preference or left unordered when context drives the choice. The framework encourages teams to weigh pros and cons rather than adopting so‑called best practices blindly. For example, when choosing a workflow, teams might weigh Kanban’s flexibility against Scrum’s structure. They might also examine trade‑offs around cycle time, predictability, coordination overhead and regulatory compliance.

Scaling and enterprise agility

DA supports scaling from single teams to entire organisations. Instead of imposing a fixed pattern like SAFe, it allows teams to select scaling strategies based on context. PMI notes that DA emphasises both tactical agility (improving team processes and collaboration) and strategic agility (optimising the entire system to deliver value aligned with strategic goals). In practice, this means aligning multiple teams around value streams, coordinating governance and leveraging organisational assets. The concept of a DAE underscores that agility is not just about speed; it is about adaptiveness and coherence across the enterprise.

How Disciplined Agile works in practice

When you look at daily work, what is disciplined agile becomes clear through its practical guidance and examples.

1) Adopting DA in startups and small to medium organisations

For early‑stage startups, adopting Disciplined Agile should begin with a pilot. Pick a cross‑functional team working on a meaningful initiative and use DA’s quick starts—pre‑defined configurations for common contexts—to establish a minimal viable way of working. Encourage the team to reflect on its practices, select options from the DA toolkit and improve incrementally. Governance should be lightweight—enough to provide oversight without stifling experimentation. As the team learns, codify decisions in a simple playbook or decision log. Expand gradually to other teams, adapting practices based on feedback.

2) Role of team collaboration

Disciplined Agile thrives on empowered teams. The toolkit assumes that those closest to the work are best placed to select and adjust practices. Teams choose their cadence, decide how they track work (Kanban board, sprint backlog or continuous flow), and integrate cross‑functional skills. Regular feedback loops (retrospectives, reviews, product demos) coordinate with the principle of relentless improvement. Collaboration extends outside the team: interacting with stakeholders, operations, finance and compliance groups ensures that decisions respect enterprise realities.

3) Iterative and adaptive planning

Planning in DA is layered. Teams craft short‑term iteration plans, longer‑term release plans and value stream plans that coordinate with business objectives. They update plans regularly based on new information and adjust scope or priorities accordingly. This layered approach acknowledges that uncertainty is inevitable. Rather than promising fixed dates far in advance, teams communicate goals, assumptions and confidence levels. When changes occur—new customer insights, technology shifts or regulatory updates—teams revisit decisions and adapt.

4) Common patterns and practices

Disciplined Agile does not prescribe a specific lifecycle. Instead, it offers several lifecycles: Scrum‑based, Kanban‑based, lean continuous delivery, exploratory, lean start‑up and combinations. It also provides options for architectural guidance, testing, requirements elicitation, governance and continuous deployment. For example, a team might adopt Scrum for iterative development but integrate Kanban boards for visualising flow, or they might use Scrumban—a mix of Scrum and Kanban—to achieve predictable cadences while allowing work item pull. The toolkit encourages teams to experiment and choose, considering trade‑offs like predictability versus flexibility and team autonomy versus enterprise coordination.

5) Continuous improvement and learning

DA incorporates a mechanism called Guided Continuous Improvement (GCI). Teams conduct regular retrospectives, gather metrics on flow efficiency, cycle time and defect rates, and compare results against desired outcomes. When issues arise—say, delays due to unclear requirements—teams can consult DA’s goal diagrams to consider options such as introducing lightweight specification practices or increasing stakeholder engagement. The Value Acceleration Process (VAP) described by PMI outlines steps: establish outcomes, conduct discovery (identify obstacles) and work the plan by selecting options and iterating. This structured yet flexible approach helps teams move past ad‑hoc improvements and ties experimentation to strategic goals.

Comparison with other frameworks and methodologies

Comparing Disciplined Agile to other approaches illuminates what disciplined agile is and how it differs from more prescriptive frameworks.

Disciplined Agile vs Scrum

Disciplined Agile vs SAFe

‍

DA vs other scaling frameworks

‍

When not to use DA

Disciplined Agile brings overhead when a single team is working on a simple product. In such cases, a straightforward framework like Scrum or Kanban may suffice. DA requires a mature mindset and coaching to handle options. Without guidance, teams may spend excessive time debating practices rather than delivering value. Organisations with rigid top‑down cultures may struggle with DA’s emphasis on team empowerment. Lastly, because DA is relatively new compared to established frameworks, finding experienced coaches can be challenging.

Benefits, risks and when to use Disciplined Agile

Understanding what is disciplined agile also involves weighing its benefits against the challenges and deciding when it makes sense to adopt it.

Benefits

• Tailored practices and flexibility: DA allows teams to craft a way of working that fits their context, combining elements from multiple frameworks. This flexibility can reduce friction and improve effectiveness.
  
  
• Alignment between governance and agility: By incorporating governance and enterprise awareness, DA helps balance compliance and speed. Teams can scale without sacrificing autonomy.
  
  
• Scalable without losing autonomy: Because DA emphasises decisionmaking at the team tier within organisational guardrails, it supports scaling while preserving team freedom.
  
  
• Sustainable improvement: Guided continuous improvement encourages measurable progress rather than superficial adoption.
  
  
• Cross‑domain coherence: The toolkit covers development, operations, architecture, finance and procurement, helping organisations harmonize practices across functions.

Risks and challenges

• Requires discipline and coaching: Teams must be willing to reflect and make intentional choices. Without guidance, they may become overwhelmed by options.
  
  
• Complexity overhead: DA’s extensive nature can seem daunting. Teams might invest more time in process discussions than in delivering value.
  
  
• Cultural buy‑in: The organisation must support empowerment and experimentation. Traditional hierarchies or compliance‑driven cultures may resist.
  
  
• Risk of inconsistency: Without some alignment mechanism, different teams might choose conflicting practices, making integration difficult.
  
  
• Trade‑off management: With many options, teams must explicitly consider trade‑offs, which can slow decisions if not facilitated.

Signals that DA might be a good fit

• Multiple teams are facing coordination and scaling challenges.
  
  
• The organisation needs to coordinate agile practices with governance, regulatory or compliance requirements.
  
  
• Leadership values agility but is concerned about risk, consistency or context‑sensitive decisions.
  
  
• Existing frameworks feel too rigid or prescriptive, and teams seek greater adaptability.

Getting started

1. Learn the basics: Educate yourself and your team on DA’s principles, values and structure. PMI’s introduction and DA’s goal diagrams are good starting points.
   
   
2. Pilot with one or two teams: Select teams willing to experiment. Use a quick start to define an initial way of working.
   
   
3. Use decision maps: Document decision points and options; discuss trade‑offs together. Keep a record of choices and revisit them during retrospectives.
   
   
4. Adapt governance incrementally: Introduce lightweight policies such as definition of done, release approval or compliance checks. Adjust as you learn.
   
   
5. Bring in coaching: An experienced coach can help teams handle options and avoid analysis paralysis.
   
   
6. Monitor and adapt: Track metrics such as cycle time, defect rate and customer satisfaction. Use data to guide improvements.

Case studies and examples

These real-world experiences show what is disciplined agile when applied to complex problems.

While detailed case studies are often proprietary, patterns from our work with early‑stage machine-learning and SaaS companies illustrate Disciplined Agile’s impact. One client—a fintech startup—initially used Scrum but struggled with compliance and integration with their banking partner. They piloted DA by mapping decision points for requirements, architecture and testing. The team chose to add lightweight architecture reviews and continuous compliance checks. After three months, they reported 30 percent faster time‑to‑market, fewer compliance issues and improved morale. Another client in healthcare combined Kanban with lean budgeting. By visualising their value stream and adopting smaller batch sizes, they reduced cycle time by 20 percent and improved alignment with regulatory reviews. Feedback from organisations in the 2025 State of Agile report supports these outcomes: around 70 percent of respondents attribute positive experiences to improved teamwork and collaboration, and more than half emphasise enhanced synchronisation between agile processes and business priorities.

Conclusion

If you’ve been wondering what disciplined agile is, this overview should give you a well-rounded answer.

Disciplined Agile offers a fresh perspective for teams who feel confined by prescriptive frameworks or overwhelmed by scaling challenges. Instead of delivering a one‑size‑fits‑all solution, it provides a toolkit that helps you ask the right questions, weigh trade‑offs and improve your way of working. By combining agile, lean, flow and other disciplines, DA recognises that context matters and that autonomy and governance can co‑exist. Whether you’re a founder, product manager or design leader, the toolkit encourages you to coordinate practices with your organisation’s goals, build cross‑functional collaboration and continuously improve. The next step? Learn the basics, start small, experiment thoughtfully and let your teams take ownership of their work.

FAQ

1) What is the meaning of Disciplined Agile? 

Disciplined Agile is a process‑decision toolkit designed to help teams optimise their way of working. It combines practices from agile, lean and traditional methods. The focus on “disciplined” emphasises intentional choices, governance and continuous improvement. It’s not a single methodology but a set of principles, values and decision models that guide teams in selecting practices that fit their context.

2) What is the difference between SAFe and Disciplined Agile? 

SAFe is a prescriptive framework for scaling agile across large enterprises. It defines roles, ceremonies and cadences, such as Program Increment planning. Disciplined Agile, by contrast, offers guidance without mandating specific practices. It lets organisations mix and match Scrum, Kanban, lean and other approaches. DA is suited to organisations seeking flexibility and contextual tailoring, whereas SAFe suits those requiring strong top‑down alignment and detailed guidance.

3) What are the four views of Disciplined Agile? 

DA often describes four views—people, process, mindset and layers. The people view emphasises roles and responsibilities; the process view comprises delivery, DevOps, value streams and enterprise-scale blades; the mindset view covers principles, promises and guidelines; and the layers view illustrates how team-tier practices connect to enterprise-scale concerns. These views help teams handle DA’s breadth and focus on the areas most relevant to them.

4) What is the difference between Scrum and Disciplined Agile? 

Scrum is a defined framework with set roles, meetings and artifacts. It works well for small teams working on complex problems and provides a clear starting point for agile adoption. Disciplined Agile encompasses Scrum as one of several lifecycle options but encourages teams to select practices based on context. It offers guidance on decisions like lifecycle choice, governance, architecture and testing. Scrum emphasises simplicity and predictability; DA emphasises flexibility, choice and enterprise alignment.

5) Is Disciplined Agile only for software teams? 

No. DA’s scope extends outside software development into operations, procurement, finance, architecture and other functions. The concept of a Disciplined Agile Enterprise demonstrates that the toolkit is designed to improve how the whole organisation senses and responds to change.

6) What skills do teams need to adopt Disciplined Agile? 

Teams should be comfortable with reflection and open discussions. Skills include facilitation, decision‑making, basic agile concepts, lean thinking and a willingness to learn. Access to experienced coaches helps handle options and avoid decision fatigue.

7) Does Disciplined Agile replace Scrum or SAFe? 

It doesn’t replace them; it incorporates them as options. Teams can adopt Scrum, SAFe or other frameworks within the DA toolkit. Disciplined Agile provides a meta structure to help teams decide which practices fit their context and adjust as they learn.