Discover what a UX audit entails, why it’s important, and the key steps to evaluate and improve your website or app’s user experience.
Imagine a founder watching sign‑ups flatten even though marketing spend keeps climbing. After tweaking ads and adjusting pricing, nothing moves. A closer look reveals that new users abandon the product mid‑onboarding. This common scenario prompts one big question: what is a UX audit and how can it help? A UX audit is a structured review of your website or app to find the points where people struggle. It does more than focus on surface details; it identifies the causes of drop‑offs, poor conversion and user frustration. For early‑stage teams, a UX audit is less a luxury and more a sanity check before investing further.
People often ask “what is a UX audit?” At its core, a UX audit is a systematic evaluation of a web‑based product or app. Its purpose is to see how easily someone can use your product and where they get stuck. Dovetail calls it a “quality assurance process” that measures how easily users can interact with a product. Put differently, when you ask what is a UX audit, you’re asking about a process that combines expert review, data and sometimes user testing to uncover hidden friction. Unlike usability testing, which asks real users to perform tasks, a UX audit infers issues from expert analysis and metrics. It isn’t a redesign, and it isn’t a one‑off spot check—audits should be repeated as the product grows.
Teams run UX audits for several reasons:
In 2025, Dovetail compiled statistics showing that strong UX can lift ecommerce conversion by up to 400%, that 70% of shoppers leave carts because of friction and that poor design can drain 35% of revenue. When stakeholders wonder what a UX audit is, remind them it’s the process that surfaces such problems so you can fix them. The study also reports that bad UX drives people away while mobile‑friendly sites bring 74% of visitors back—another reason founders should understand what a UX audit is.
Run an audit when:
Different methods reveal different insights, so a solid audit combines several approaches without going overboard.
Experts compare your interface against established usability heuristics. The Infragistics guide describes how reviewers walk through a product to spot bugs, confusing labels and poor flows. They often use Nielsen’s ten heuristics—visibility of status, match between system and real world, user control, consistency, error prevention, recognition rather than recall, flexibility, minimalism, error recovery and help. Heuristic evaluations are quick and inexpensive but depend on evaluator skill; they may miss issues only real users encounter.
Usability testing recruits real users to perform tasks while you observe. GeeksforGeeks explains that usability testing is conducted by non‑professionals and focuses on how easily they access features. It uncovers confusion that experts can’t anticipate. Include a few task‑based sessions in your audit to validate assumptions.
Map the steps users take to complete tasks and pinpoint where they drop off. Simple flow diagrams reveal missing feedback, unclear calls‑to‑action or dead ends. Combine this with analytics to quantify abandonment.
An accessibility review looks at keyboard navigation, colour contrast, screen‑reader support and compliance with guidelines. Use tools like axe or WAVE as a first pass and follow up manually to catch subtler issues.
Words matter. Review labels, instructions and messages for clarity and consistency, remove jargon and unify tone.
Slow pages create frustration. Measure load times and responsiveness; VWO notes that 88% of users are less likely to return after a bad experience. Optimize images, scripts and queries.
Surveys, support tickets and user interviews reveal patterns that numbers alone miss. Tools like Hotjar or FullStory add heatmaps and recordings for context.
For a conversion lens, simplify flows, clarify calls‑to‑action and minimize friction. Use A/B tests to confirm which changes actually help.
Finally, compare your product with competitors. Look at their onboarding and help centres to understand conventions and prioritise fixes.
Here’s a lean process for small teams.
Get on the same page with stakeholders about goals and scope. Decide which flows to review and collect existing metrics and feedback to use as a baseline.
Analyze metrics such as bounce rate, funnel drop‑offs and error logs. Use heatmaps and recordings to see behaviour and identify abandonment points.
Use heuristic checklists to walk through each flow. Record issues with screenshots and severity ratings. Check content, accessibility and performance.
Run short sessions with a handful of participants, asking them to complete tasks while thinking aloud. Observe where they struggle and use their feedback to validate your findings.
Group issues by theme, rate severity based on impact and effort, and link qualitative findings to metrics. Focus on changes that will move numbers.
For each issue, describe the problem, propose a solution and group fixes into quick wins and longer projects. Provide sketches where helpful.
Prepare a clear report with an overview, issue list, visuals and a prioritisation matrix. Explain why each problem matters and how fixes will affect metrics.
After implementing fixes, measure the same metrics and run A/B tests to confirm improvements. Schedule follow‑up audits; Pendo’s data warns that 60 % of features are rarely used when teams skip user research.
Use heuristic and audit checklists from Maze or Contentsquare to ensure you don’t miss major usability principles. VWO’s blog summarises common issues and provides sample heuristics.
Include unique issue IDs, severity labels, annotated visuals and a phased roadmap. Break proposed changes into quick wins, medium‑term projects and long‑term refactors.
At a SaaS startup, trial users weren’t converting because onboarding was overwhelming and error messages were full of jargon. A lean audit led the team to simplify onboarding, add clear feedback and improve load times. Within a month conversion rose and support tickets fell—small evidence‑driven changes delivered measurable results.
The question of a UX audit has a straightforward answer: it’s a structured assessment that reveals where users struggle and why your metrics stall. A UX audit combines expert review, data analysis and user testing to produce actionable insights. Early‑stage startups stand to gain the most because small usability improvements often yield big returns. When you ask yourself again what is a UX audit, think of it as an investigative process that keeps your product honest about the experience it delivers. Research shows that users make judgments within a fraction of a second and that fixing issues during design is far cheaper than fixing them later. By investing in UX audits, teams improve conversions, retention and user satisfaction while avoiding expensive rework. Don’t wait—pick a critical flow this week, walk through it as a new user and identify friction points. The sooner you start, the faster you’ll build a product people love to use.
Audit your product and see the difference. Even a small audit will uncover issues you didn’t expect. Let evidence guide your design decisions. Start small. Your users will appreciate the improved experience.
A UX audit is a structured review of a product or app that uncovers usability, accessibility, performance and content issues. It blends expert evaluation with data and sometimes user testing. Put another way, when someone asks what is a UX audit they want to know how to systematically spot and fix the issues that stop users from succeeding.
Teams use UX audits to improve conversion and retention, guide design with evidence and avoid expensive fixes later.
Plan the scope, gather data, conduct expert reviews and usability tests, prioritise findings, implement fixes and measure their impact.
Audits can focus on heuristics, usability tests, accessibility, content, performance, conversion or competitor comparison. Mixing methods yields a fuller picture.
It reviews labels, buttons and messages for clarity and consistency, ensuring words support tasks rather than confuse users.
Timing varies: a short audit can last a week while a deeper one spans several weeks, depending on scope and data.
Internal teams know the product but may be biased; external reviewers bring fresh eyes. Many companies use a combination of both.
Deliverables usually include an overview, a ranked issue list, annotated visuals and a prioritised action plan.
A UX audit covers usability, accessibility, content and performance, whereas a conversion‑focused audit targets sign‑ups or purchases and relies on experiments. They complement each other.
Measure before and after metrics like conversion rate, task completion and drop‑off; run experiments to confirm improvements and gather user feedback.
Very new products might not need a full audit, but once you have real users and data, even a lean review yields valuable insights. Start small and iterate.